Tely against the initiative liberal Strove For Soft strove for soft action recruitment financial aid remedial programs against hard affirmative action numerical oals uotas In the process of balancing ideals of race and ender euality with competing notions of colorblindness and meritocracy they even borrowed the language of the civil rights era to make far reaching claims about euality justice and citizenship in their anti affirmative action rhetoric Deslippe traces this conflict through compelling case
STUDIES OF REAL PEOPLE AND REAL of real people and real He asks what the introduction of affirmative action meant to the careers and livelihoods of Seattle ste.
A lightning rod for liberal
And Conservative Opposition Alike Affirmativeconservative opposition alike affirmative has proved one of the divisive issues in the United States over the past five decades Dennis Deslippe here offers a thoughtful study of early opposition to the nation's race and ender sensitive hiring and promotion programs in higher education and the workplace This story begins than fifteen years before the 1978 landmark US Supreme Court case Regents of the University of California v Bakke Partisans attacked affirmative action almost immediately after it first
APPEARED IN THE 1960S LIBERALS INin the 1960s Liberals in opposition
Movement Played An Especiallyplayed an especially role While not comple. ,
Dennis Deslippe ↠ 9 CHARACTERSElworkers New York asbestos handlers
ST LOUIS FIREMEN DETROIT POLICEMEN CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEWLouis firemen Detroit policemen City University of New academics and admissions counselors at the University of Washington Law School Through their experiences Deslippe examines the diverse reactions to affirmative action concluding that workers had legitimate The Complete Idiot's Guide to Detoxing Your Body grievances against its hiring and promotion practices In studying phenomenon Deslippe deepens our understanding of American democracy and neoconservatism in the late twentieth century and shows how the liberals' Deslippe deepens our understanding of American democracy and neoconservatism in the late twentieth century and shows how the liberals' contradictory positions of the 1960s and 1970s reflect the conflicted views about affirmative action many Americans still hold toda.